Nothing to do with World War II - I need to make a decision today regarding which pair of Meta sunglasses I will keep. They both have good points and bad - no idea why I have been racking my brain over this decision.
But, in the meantime, I got out on the CTX this morning. And, at the last minute, I tossed the Ray-Ban Wayfarers in the trunk of the bike. I tried to put them on under the helmet, but... no go; they wouldn't fit under there. I didn't even try the Oakley Vanguards, since they are significantly larger.
A great morning for a ride, but warming up quickly. A couple still images...
Yes, shot with the Wayfarer's camera. And, the video...
Since the glasses wouldn't fit under my helmet, I rode without a helmet for the short time I was trying the glasses. Yeah, that was a bit unnerving. I may not always wear a jacket due to the heat here in the desert, but I always wear a helmet. Even if I am just taking the scooter around the neighborhood.
The video is "unlisted" - not being put out anywhere except here on the blog. The audio was a bit distorted at times. To be fair, these glasses were not designed for video/audio on a motorcycle.
I have one more thing I want to try with the Oakley Vanguards, then it is decision time.
--------
Glasses... blah, blah... you know what we come here for.
Yes, I do...
--------
I tried the third of three nose pieces that came with the Oakleys. They are designed for different nose bridge heights. I do notice a difference with each, but I can't say that one is a better fit than the others. The Oakleys "grip" your head; the Wayfarers fit like more traditional sunglasses
More angst. A list of pros and cons. In the end, it came down to: one of these has better sound, a better camera position, a better lens field of view, and (for me) are better sunglasses (no frames in your line of sight; nice gray lenses). The cons for these glasses: more cost and and what some consider "an aggressive" style.
Yeah, the Oakleys...
When I visited with Joan about it, she said, "A year from now you aren't going to miss the money difference - keep them both if you want." No, I really don't need two smart glasses that do pretty much the same thing, even if the approach for each is different. Then, she added, "And as far as the unusual look to them, since when do you care what anyone thinks about the way you look?" That's a fair question. But, some people are put off by the Oakley styles... I used to be one of those people. I'm not keen on having something that screams "Look at me!" That's probably in my head. Hopefully not on my face.
I cleaned the fingerprints off the Ray-Bans and packed them away, just like new. Joan got the return label printed. It's a done deal.
She also asked, "When will the next generation of these glasses come out? The action cameras you buy seem to get a new version released right after you buy them... so, if a new version of these glasses come out with something you can't live without, get 'em." She gets me. ;-) For the record, the Gen 1 Meta glasses were out almost two years before the Gen 2 versions came out. And these Oakleys have been out for about 6 months.
Now I can obsess about something else. ;-)


























